Campus Compact

Educating citizens • building communities

Home > Initiatives > Legislation & Policy > Cassidy & Associates Higher Education Policy Update

jobs.jpg

Cassidy & Associates Higher Education Policy Update


Cassidy & Associates Higher Education Policy Update

December 2005

  1. Fiscal Year 2006 Budget Appropriations
  2. Budget Reconciliation
  3. Higher Education Act Reauthorization

Fiscal Year 2006 Appropriations

On December 14, the House of Representatives passed the final Conference Report for the fiscal year 2006 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations bill. The bill was revised after it failed to pass in November. At the time of this update, the Senate had yet to vote on the conference report and it is unclear if there are enough votes to pass it. If the bill fails to pass, it is possible that programs under the Departments of Labor, HHS, and Education will be funded at fiscal year 2005 levels through a continuing resolution.

Major education funding items of note include:

  • $12.8 billion for Title I
  • $11.5 billion for IDEA
  • $1.3 billion for Vocational Education
  • $13.2 billion for Pell Grants, an increase of $800 million over fiscal year 2005
  • $990 million for Work Study
  • $779 million for SEOG Grants
  • $66 million for Perkins Loans
  • $836 million for TRIO
  • $360 million for GEAR UP
  • $909 million for the Corporation for National and Community Service, including:
    • $267 million for AmeriCorps grants
    • $140 million for the National Service Trust
    • $96 million for VISTA
    • $37.5 million for Learn and Serve

View funding levels for all programs included in the Conference Report Adobe Acrobat Document.

Budget Reconciliation

For the first time since 1997, Congress is going through the process of budget reconciliation, where federal funding in mandatory programs is reduced in stand-alone legislation. The House of Representatives passed the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report on December 19. At the time of this update, the Senate had not voted on the bill.

Major provisions of the Reconciliation Conference Report related to education include:

  • Allows graduate students access to PLUS loans (which allow loans up to the cost of attendance);
  • Repeals the “single-holder” rule, which requires that students who have all of their loans with a single lender to consolidate with that lender (rather than having a choice of lenders);
  • Modifies loan consolidation rules and eliminates counter-productive provisions to encourage loan rehabilitation, rather than allowing loan consolidation out of default;
  • Prohibits new schools from entering the “school-as-lender” program, which allows schools to also act as the lending institution to those students in attendance, thus creating a potential conflict of interest scenario where the school would benefit with an increase in loan interest rates; implements additional restrictions on schools already in the program to ensure program integrity;
  • Implements an IRS data match system to verify financial aid information of students to eliminate waste and fraud;
  • Clarifies federal law regarding the prohibition of convicted felons from receiving federal grant, work, or loan assistance to state the law applies to students who are currently enrolled, receiving federal Title IV aid, and convicted of the offense;
  • Increases grant aid for math and science students, specifically for low-income, high achieving first and second year students pursuing degrees in math, science, and certain high-need foreign languages;
  • Increases the income cap students may earn without losing student loan eligibility;
  • Makes various financial aid calculation changes, removing or lessening provisions that that negatively affect how 529 savings plans are pre-paid tuition plans are treated, along with other changes that affect families with small business and unique state tuition plans;
  • Creates a new College Access Initiative to coordinate all statewide college access information through the loan guarantors in the student loan program;
  • Increases loan relief for certain high-demand teachers (math, science, and special education teachers) from $5,000 to $17,500; also makes loan relief provisions permanent;
  • Allows active duty personnel enrolled in higher education courses to be treated as independent students (which increases financial aid access and qualifications);
  • 50/50 Rule: Modifies the 50/50 rule pertaining to the definition of an institution of higher education by excluding courses offered via telecommunications services from being considered as correspondence courses. As a result, telecommunications courses would not contribute toward the 50 percent limit on correspondence classes to be considered an institution of higher learning.
  • Loan Fees: Strikes the authorization for lenders to be assessed and to pay an “administrative cost allowance” and inserts a “loan processing and issuance fee” instead; (up to 0.4 percent of the balance of loan that were insured each year).
  • Family Education Loan Program: Reauthorizes the federal family education loan program (FFELP) through 2016; reauthorizes the federal loan insurance program through 2008; reauthorizes interest subsidized loans through 2012; reauthorizes federal consolidation loans through 2012.
  • Increased Loan Limits: Increases the federal loan limits from $2,625 to $3,500 for first year students and from $3,500 to $4,500 for students who have completed their first year, the net effect being increased access and options to higher education for students. Aggregate undergraduate borrowing limits will remain unchanged at $23,000, and graduate unsubsidized annual borrowing limits will increase from $10,000 to $12,000;
  • Consolidation Loan Limits: Requires, after July 1, 2007, federal consolidation loans to be counted against the applicable limits on the total indebtedness of the student – one of the determinates in qualifying for student loans.
  • Loan Interest Rates: Eliminates a scheduled switch (on July 1, 2006) from the current variable-rate formula (also known as an adjustable rate – an interest rate that fluctuates based on an underlying index, in this case the 91-day Treasury bill plus 2.3%) to a fixed rate (6.8% for students and 7.9% for parents) for certain federal student loans. Thus, current variable-rate formulas would continue to be in effect at such date, the net effect of which would increase federal income from incoming loan payments. Using the current variable rate formula, a student’s interest rate would be approximately 4.7% today.
  • Consolidated Loan Interest Rates: Allows, after July 1, 2006, students with consolidated loans to choose between a variable rate formula (91-day Treasury bill rate plus 2.3% for students or plus 3.1% for parents) and a fixed rate (set at the 91-day Treasury bill rate plus 3.3% for students or plus 4.1% for parents).
  • Interest Rate Caps: Extends interest rate caps – one for student loans at 8.25% and one for parent loans at 9%.
  • Loan Origination Fee: Imposes a one-time consolidation loan offset fee of 1% on the principal amount on consolidated student loans. Also phases down the current 4% fee on Stafford loans to 1% over five years. Thus, borrowers in both FFELP and FDLP will pay 1% on Stafford loans by FY2010.
  • Loan Deferment for Military: Adds a new provision under which military or National Guard personnel who are serving on active duty during a war or other military operation or national emergency may defer their loan payments for up to three years.
  • Loan Forgiveness for Service in Areas of National Need: Provides for loan forgiveness for service in areas of national need and stipulates specific areas of service, including early childhood educators, nurses, foreign language specialists, librarians, certain teachers, and others.
  • 9.5 Percent Loans: Modifies the formula for certain loans funded with financing based on tax-exempt bonds (commonly known as “9.5 Percent” loans) by permanently extending the current policy (due to expire December 31, 2005, when they would revert back to a pre-October 2004 structure which is more costly for the government) and expanding its scope to include all new loans supported with similar financing.
  • Default Loan Rate Insurance: Reduces the percentage that most lenders are reimbursed for defaulted loans from 98 to 96 percent and tightens eligibility requirements for lenders to qualify as “exceptional” to receive 98 percent reimbursement (instead of the previous 100 percent reimbursement rate for exceptional qualifiers).
  • Discretionary Administrative Expenses: Eliminates mandatory funding requirement for administrative expenses beginning in 2007, but retains mandatory funding for account maintenance fees. CBO states “Section 458 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 specifies a direct appropriation for the government’s administrative costs associated with operating the financial assistance programs for post-secondary education students. The statute does not limit the amount provided for those activities after 2002; thus, this account is an uncapped direct spending account.” While some may question whether actual dollar-for-dollar savings will be realized through the appropriations process, this reform is an attempt to address an open-ended administrative entitlement and provide for more annual oversight.
  • Loan Forgiveness for 9/11 Victims: Provides student loan forgiveness for survivors of victims of the September 11, 2001, attacks, including spouses or parents who are paying loans belonging to or on behalf of a 9/11 victim.

Higher Education Act Reauthorization

Congress did not complete reauthorization of the Higher Education Act in 2005. It is expected that this will be a top priority for completion in Spring 2006.

Cassidy & Associates is a government relations firm located in Washington D.C. For more information on Cassidy and its services, contact Lisa Bos at 202/585-2885 or lbos {at} cassidy(.)com

Thanks to Campus Compact for all that you have done over the years to nurture the campus service and service-learning movement. When we started at St. A's 15 years ago there was a feeling among some campuses that we were seeing higher education's latest 'flash in the pan.' Instead it was the beginning of a revolution of ideas and relationships, and you guys have been fueling us all the way."

-Daniel Forbes, Director, Meelia Center for Community Service, Saint Anselm College